front page
directory
news
resources
about
contacts
archives
   
   
The Sunflower
 
By Simon Wiesenthal
Schoken Books, New York, 1976.

 
Book Review by Joel Mark Solliday
 
Editor, Campus CrossWalk, Fall Edition, 2005
 
   
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Simon Wiesenthal, a Nazi concentration camp survivor, devoted his life to documenting the crimes of the Holocaust and bringing Nazi war criminals to justice. He recently died at the age of 96 and I take this opportunity to review his book, The Sunflower, one of the most riveting reads you‘ll ever enjoy.

Actually, enjoy is not the right word. The Sunflower will force you to ask some deeply troubling questions about the nature of repentance and forgiveness. This book is a spiritual wrestling match, even if you read it alone.

Wiesenthal, a young architect in Poland, was captured when Nazi Germany invaded the Soviet Union in 1941. In four years, he was held in twelve different concentration camps. He survived near executions and a couple suicide attempts. In the end, eighty-nine of his relatives died in the Holocaust.

ABOUT THE BOOK:

The Sunflower is a snapshot in the life of the author, relating an experience in a Nazi concentration camp. In such a context, one longs for outside work details. During one such excursion, Wiesenthal marched near a German military cemetery. On each grave was planted a sunflower. Butterflies were dancing around them. Wiesenthal was sure his own fate would amount to a mass grave and no sunflower would ever attract butterflies to his resting place. So he actually envied the dead soldiers.

The work brigade arrived at reserve hospital where the prisoners were assigned their dirty duties. A nurse singled Wiesenthal out and led him to the room of a German soldier wrapped in bandages and lying motionless on a bed. He was a severe burn victim who was desperate to speak with a Jew.

His name was Karl, a member of the SS. He said to Wiesenthal, “I have not much longer to live.” He then spoke of an experience that was “torturing” him, something “dreadful” and “inhuman.” He had participated in an atrocity that left about 200 Jewish men, women and children, locked in a three-story house burning to death. He also told of his part in a murder of a family with a small child. Now, he was begging a Jew to forgive him so he could die in peace.

Wiesenthal was fully convinced that the man’s confession and repentance was real. It was unforced and it came without any excuses.

What would you do? That is the moral and spiritual dilemma of The Sunflower. Do any of us even have the right to forgive sins committed against others? What do we owe the victims? Is the crime too heinous to forgive? Can you forgive the person but not the deeds? Can you excuse the young soldier but not the evil organizers? Amid the dilemma, Wiesenthal was so confident of the guilt and so uncertain about forgiveness.

After telling the story, Wiesenthal assembled a symposium of responses by leading intellectuals to the question of what they would have done in his place. Their responses compose the second half of the book. While the excerpts below are lifted out of their context, they do exemplify the many different approaches one can take to and from such a penetrating question.

Henry Marcues concluded, “I believe that the easy forgiving of such crimes perpetuates the very evil it wants to alleviate.”

Rene Cassin counseled the refusal to forgive, saying, “The zealous repression of crimes against humanity is a duty unlimited by time.”

David Daiches wrote, “I don’t see how in any genuinely meaningful sense one individual can offer forgiveness for crimes that were not committed against him.”

Constantine FitzGibbon vented, saying, “I think I would strangle him in his bed.”

Edward H. Flannery, a Catholic, averred, “It is clear that forgiveness of repented sin is one of the basic concepts underlying the Judeo-Christian morality as well as universal natural ethics.”

Hans Habe added, “One of the worst crimes of the Nazi regime was that it made it so hard for us to forgive.”

Abraham J. Heschel said, “No one can forgive crimes committed by other people.”

Christopher Holis advocated for a word of compassion to the dying German. His reason; “The law of God is the law of love.” Holis noted that the man’s confession revealed his willingness to make restitution if he only could.

John M. Oesterreicher reminded us that only humans are granted the capacity to forgive. He added, “To repent and to forgive are not arrogant struggles to change the course of events, vain attempts to undo what has been done; rather they are daring, loving ventures to offer new meaning to the ’dead’ and deadly past.”

In the end, the question still stands.

Joel Mark Solliday M.Div., is the editor of Campus CrossWalk and the pulpit minister of the Brooklyn Center Church of Christ in Minnesota. A Pepperdine graduate, he later worked in their Campus Life Office and at ACU as a Missionary in Residence. He earned his M.Div. at Fuller Theological Seminary. At 51, he is in his first glorious year of marriage to Katie!
 
 
front page of this issue
front page of current issue
 
posted 10/26/05     update 01/13/06
© Campus Crosswalk